F16 Or Su35 Which Wins

Introduction to the F-16 and Su-35

The F-16 Fighting Falcon and the Su-35 Flanker-E are two of the most advanced fighter jets in the world, developed by the United States and Russia, respectively. Both aircraft have been widely used in various military operations and have undergone significant upgrades over the years. In this article, we will compare the two fighter jets and try to determine which one comes out on top.

Design and Features

The F-16 is a single-engine, multirole fighter jet designed for air-to-air and air-to-ground combat. It has a length of 49 feet 5 inches, a wingspan of 31 feet, and a height of 16 feet. The Su-35, on the other hand, is a twin-engine, multirole fighter jet designed for air superiority and ground attack missions. It has a length of 72 feet, a wingspan of 50 feet, and a height of 19 feet. The Su-35 is significantly larger than the F-16, which gives it a disadvantage in terms of maneuverability.

Performance Comparison

In terms of performance, the F-16 has a top speed of over Mach 2 (around 1,500 mph), while the Su-35 has a top speed of over Mach 2.25 (around 1,700 mph). The Su-35 also has a longer range, with a combat radius of over 1,500 miles, compared to the F-16’s range of around 1,000 miles. However, the F-16 has a higher climb rate and a tighter turn radius, making it more agile in dogfighting situations.

Avionics and Electronics

Both aircraft have advanced avionics and electronics systems, including radar, electronic countermeasures, and communication systems. The F-16 has an AN/APG-66 radar system, while the Su-35 has an Irbis-E radar system. The Irbis-E radar system is more advanced and has a longer range, but the AN/APG-66 is more reliable and has better multitarget tracking capabilities.

Armament and Firepower

The F-16 can carry a variety of air-to-air and air-to-ground missiles, including the AIM-120 AMRAAM, AIM-9 Sidewinder, and AGM-88 HARM. The Su-35 can also carry a range of missiles, including the R-77, R-73, and Kh-59. The Su-35 has a higher payload capacity, with a maximum load of over 17,000 pounds, compared to the F-16’s maximum load of around 11,000 pounds.

Cockpit and Pilot Interface

The F-16 has a single-seat cockpit with a HUD (heads-up display) and a HOTAS (hands-on-throttle-and-stick) control system. The Su-35 also has a single-seat cockpit with a HUD and a HOTAS control system. However, the Su-35’s cockpit is more advanced, with a larger display screen and more automated systems.

Comparison of Key Features

Here is a summary of the key features of the F-16 and Su-35:

Feature	F-16	Su-35
Top Speed	Over Mach 2	Over Mach 2.25
Range	Around 1,000 miles	Over 1,500 miles
Climb Rate	Higher	Lower
Turn Radius	Tighter	Wider
Radar System	AN/APG-66	Irbis-E
Payload Capacity	Around 11,000 pounds	Over 17,000 pounds

🚀 Note: The comparison of the F-16 and Su-35 is based on publicly available data and may not reflect the actual performance of the aircraft in real-world combat scenarios.

The F-16 and Su-35 are both highly advanced fighter jets with unique strengths and weaknesses. While the Su-35 has a higher top speed and longer range, the F-16 has a higher climb rate and tighter turn radius, making it more agile in dogfighting situations. Ultimately, the choice between the two aircraft depends on the specific mission requirements and the pilot’s personal preferences.

In terms of air-to-air combat, the F-16’s agility and maneuverability give it an edge over the Su-35. However, in air-to-ground combat, the Su-35’s higher payload capacity and longer range make it a more effective platform. The F-16’s advanced avionics and electronics systems also give it an advantage in terms of situational awareness and targeting capabilities.

Overall, both the F-16 and Su-35 are highly capable fighter jets that have proven themselves in various military operations. While the Su-35 may have an edge in terms of raw performance, the F-16’s agility and advanced avionics make it a more versatile and effective platform.

To summarize, the key points are: * The F-16 has a higher climb rate and tighter turn radius, making it more agile in dogfighting situations. * The Su-35 has a higher top speed and longer range, making it more effective in air-to-ground combat. * The F-16’s advanced avionics and electronics systems give it an advantage in terms of situational awareness and targeting capabilities. * The Su-35’s higher payload capacity makes it a more effective platform for air-to-ground combat.

The outcome of a hypothetical dogfight between the F-16 and Su-35 would depend on various factors, including the skill level of the pilots, the terrain, and the weather conditions. However, based on the analysis above, it is likely that the F-16 would have an edge in close combat, while the Su-35 would have an advantage in long-range engagements.